Forget-Me-Not Chapter 5

You may also like...

110 Responses

  1. Michelle says:

    Hi there! So many thoughts and emotions intertwined in this otherwise brief section of your story. I agree 100% with the comments surrounding the amazing character development. The characters are so vibrant and intricate, simultaneously. Thank you very much – Ms Puddle!

  2. Irana93 says:

    Interesting chapter and the significance of “Love and Gratitude” is pronounced. Both Candy and Albert have intense but also conflicting feelings for each other in tandem with their own inner fears and insecurities. Relationships which start off as friends and then develop into romance are the finest and most long-lasting ones but they are also the most difficult ones during the initial ‘transition’ phase from friendship to courtship.

    Needless to mention that your Terry-themed fanart is incredible. Love the bluish-green hues selected for Terry’s eyes as well as his sombre expression. You have also done a great job with his wavy hair and slight ‘signature-style’ smirk.😉

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Thank you @Irana93 for your highly encouraging words❣️ I agree with you that relationships that begin as friends are often longer lasting. Yes, in Candy and Albert’s case, they have their own demons or insecurities to deal with.

      Glad you like the colour and expression I have selected for my drawing of Terry. Speaking of his hair, I truly admire Igarashi’s illustrations. I can’t seem to mimic her way to showcase the softness of his hair. Oh well… 😅 I’m happy with the slight smirk though 😉 I’m delighted that you noticed it. Thanks again, my friend! 😘🤗

      • Irana93 says:

        Well, that was his style and appeal during his youth.. With a severely problematic character as Terry’s, the only way anyone would be attracted to him would be due to his looks. That’s all he had. Once he would get older and wrinkly, the number of his admirers would reach rock bottom in no time and younger and much more attractive males would toss him aside. That’s the inevitable outcome for all toxic male chauvinists as Terry; they end up old, alone and miserable. Even Terry’s own fans fantasize about him when he was a teenager at St Paul’s. Time has stopped there for them, hence, they’re glued to the past.

        • Ms Puddle says:

          I agree with you, @Irana93, and it seems his fans were stuck in the period when he was but a teenager at St Paul’s. If he had continued to be a male chauvinist, he would end up being miserable and lonely, like you said.

          On the other hand, in the manga or anime, Terry behaved like a gentleman to Susanna, especially after the accident. In CCFS, he even took care of her when she was struggling with ongoing health issues and did not abandon her. He stayed with her until she breathed her last. In other words, he had changed a lot and grown more mature for sure.

          • Irana93 says:

            That’s correct and let’s face it – Terry would have never become engaged to Susanna unless he wanted to. Irrespective of what certain hysterical and delusional Terry-fans want to believe, Terry had feelings for Susanna and he had even admitted this in the manga and anime. In the novel, readers never get go know how Terry feels because he’s reduced as a character after the end of section two; however, actions speak louder than words and Terry’s refusal to dispel the rumours wanting him as Susanna’s lover in tandem with his decision to dump Candy and choose Susanna, both reveal his intentions and preferences which lean towards Susanna. No doubt, Terry cared about Candy but his feelings for Susanna were also significant and as it turned out, even more so based on his selection. If Terry had written that scrap-note after Susanna’s death, then that confirms even further that his priority was Susanna’s welfare and not Candy’s.

            • Irana93 says:

              Typo – “In the novel, readers never get to know how..”
              If there are any other typos, just ignore them.
              Thanks again!

            • Ms Puddle says:

              Well said, @Irana93!

              You’re absolutely right that actions speak louder than words, and one can lead a horse to water but one can’t make him drink. Terry chose Susanna because she was more important to him. Though he had wavered and left her, he did return to her side and stay till she died. Therefore, it doesn’t make much sense to me that his brief note was sent after her demise.

              • Irana93 says:

                It seems that Nagita simply tossed that scrap-paper to the Terry-fans to stop them from pestering her any further with their diseased obsession over a mere cartoon character. That note has no date and not even a proper name. Therefore, readers have the liberty to do whatever they want and interpret it as they please. It’s a bit of a wild card..
                If Nagita really wanted a reunion between Candy and Terry, she would have created a decent story surrounding their rekindled love. Instead, Terry is reduced even further to irrelevancy in the text and the author has decided to amplify and elaborate on the intricate and intimate relationship between Candy and Albert.
                The hypocrisy of some Terry-fans is so massive that if it had been the other way around and the Epilogue was based on Candy and Terry instead, they would have been jumping like lunatics from joy. Since the Epilogue is based exclusively on Candy and Albert, however, they Terry-fans have been going ballistic and often stooping to the lowest of the low levels to try to trash Candy, Albert and even the author herself. No matter how much they froth at the mouth though, the author has made her decision and is thus indifferent to their hysterical tantrums and intellectually impaired claims.

              • Irana93 says:

                It seems that Nagita simply tossed that scrap-paper to the Terry-fans to stop them from pestering her any further with their diseased obsession over a mere cartoon character. That note has no date and not even a proper name. Therefore, readers have the liberty to do whatever they want and interpret it as they please. It’s a bit of a wild card..
                If Nagita really wanted a reunion between Candy and Terry, she would have created a decent story surrounding their rekindled love. Instead, Terry is reduced even further to irrelevancy in the text and the author has decided to amplify and elaborate on the intricate and intimate relationship between Candy and Albert.
                The hypocrisy of some Terry-fans is so massive that if it had been the other way around and the Epilogue was based on Candy and Terry instead, they would have been jumping like lunatics from joy. Since the Epilogue is based exclusively on Candy and Albert, however, the Terry-fans have been going ballistic and often stooping to the lowest of the low levels to try to trash Candy, Albert and even the author herself. No matter how much they froth at the mouth though, the author has made her decision and is thus indifferent to their hysterical tantrums and intellectually impaired claims.

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  Well said, @Irana93! It’s like a wild card indeed, and Terry fans can imagine whatever they like.

                  I couldn’t agree with you more! The author chose not to write anything about Terry and Candy’s reunion, not even a hint! On the contrary, Candy seemed quite over Terry in her unsent letter to Terry as well as her letter to Little Bert. 😉

  3. diana says:

    Espero con ansias el siguiente capitulo, me encantan. mis respetos Ms. Puddle.

  4. Elena says:

    Beautiful illustration of Terry and I am pleased with the ways in which your story is progressing. Honestly, you should consider taking up writing professionally. You got the flair!

    Best Wishes,
    Elena

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Thank you @Elena for your kind words to my drawing as well as the story❣️ I don’t think I want to take up writing professionally though… I don’t have the right talents I feel. Honestly, I’m already content with what I’m doing on my blog ☺️💞 Best wishes to you too 😘

  5. DreamCatcher says:

    Hello @Ms Puddle,

    Thanks for sharing your fanfic and fanart with the CC community. Your portrayal of Terry Graham is of very high quality and, arguably, much better than many of the fanart created by Terrfans. I think you’ve nailed it with the eye colour, btw.

    Regarding the development of your fanfic, it seems that the additional characters are blending really well with the overall story. Your decision in writing about the nature of the relationship between Albert and the American nurse (Kimberly) has proven to be awesome. I’m sure that many readers of the CCFS would be interested to know about Albert’s past (love) life. Both Terry and Albert are complex and extraordinary characters; it’s such a pity that Nagita decided to leave her readers in the dark concerning those two characters.

    Talk to you again soon!

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Hello @DreamCatcher, thank you for your positive feedback to my drawing of Terry❣️ I just started following a Japanese artist on Twitter, who is highly likely a Terry fan, and her drawings of Terry are of excellent quality. 👏👍 But in her drawings Terry seems more tender than the one depicted in the manga or CCFS. 😉

      So glad to hear that you like how I weave my characters into the story. This is very encouraging! I just thought Albert should be able to attract other women effortlessly. 😍

      Take care!

      • DreamCatcher says:

        I agree with you about Albert’s appeal. It appears that his character is far more appreciated and important in the novel than in the anime and manga put together. Whilst Terry was always relevant in the anime and manga, he ceases to be as such after the second section of the novel.

        • Ms Puddle says:

          Yes @DreamCatcher, I couldn’t agree with you more about Terry’s character being reduced in CCFS. In section 3, even Archie has a voice, unlike Terry, who seemingly belongs to Candy’s distant memories.

          • DreamCatcher says:

            You’re right about that. Many online reviews of this new novel express this change but at the same time there is also positive feedback concerning Albert’s character development. There are several interesting reviews of this novel (in Spanish and Italian) where the reviewers were put off by the reduction of Terry’s character. On the other hand, these reviewers were pleasantly surprised with the development of Albert’s character where they commented that readers could better appreciate him in the novel as opposed to the ways in which he was reduced in the anime. It seems that Terry had the ‘upper hand’ in the anime but he lost that to Albert when it came to the manga and novel.

            • Ms Puddle says:

              Yes indeed, @DreamCatcher! Thank you for sharing these comments or reviews with us.

              No doubt Terry was popular likely because of the popularity of the anime. It did elevate his role so much when compared to the manga, where Albert had more significance after Candy’s trip to New York.

              • DreamCatcher says:

                It would be safe to assume that Terry was more prominent in the anime whilst Albert was more prominent in the manga. Interestingly enough, Keiko Nagita reduced Terry’s role and significance even more in the novel and, in contrast, reinforced and enriched the characters of Candy and Albert in tandem with their intricate relationship.

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  My sentiments exactly, @DreamCatcher! Nagita sensei said she could not write as much as she had intended, so the choices she had made speak volumes, don’t you think? 😉

  6. Gabriella says:

    Hi! It appears that this chapter is a bit shorter than the previous one but it’s just as fascinating, nonetheless.😊

    Hope all is well with you and please accept my kind regards.❤️🙏

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Yes @Gabriella last chapter was an exception lol. I usually try not to publish lengthy chapters, but thank you so much for your encouraging words, my friend ❣️ My best wishes to you too, and take care 🙏 🤗

      • Gabriella says:

        Your fanfiction is always enjoyable to read irrespective of the chapter-length. 😊📚

        I’m glad that you also decided to draw other characters of the novel such as Terry. Hopefully, you’ll also draw Stear and Patty.🤞

        • Ms Puddle says:

          Thank you @Gabriella for your kind words and encouragement! Yes I’ll try to draw other characters, and sometimes it depends on where my muse takes me 😉

  7. Sarah says:

    Thank you for taking the time to share another brilliant chapter of your fanfic, Ms Puddle. This is most appreciated. This story is getting better and better..;-)))

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Thank you @Sarah for your unflagging support and ongoing encouragement❣️ 💞 It’s much appreciated. It also keeps me motivated to continue writing ☺️

      • Sarah says:

        I also like the way in which you have drawn Terry. Anthony, Terry and Albert are equivalently beautiful male characters albeit each in their own distinct and unique way. Igarashi had managed to make loads of folks become attracted to those otherwise fictitious characters. LoL

        • Ms Puddle says:

          Hi @Sarah, thank you for your encouragement!

          Like you, I also think Igarashi is an amazing artist! As I said, I managed to publish my post on the day when many fans celebrated Anthony’s birthday. The pictures showed that he was very good looking, and even though he looked so much like the Prince on the Hill, Anthony was attractive in his own unique way! 👏👍

          • Sarah says:

            Albeit commented quite often by Afans & Tfans alike, I think that these actors would have made a really cool cast for those three male anime/manga characters:

            1. Anthony: Joe Alwyn (he could be a younger Albert since Anthony and Albert looked so much alike);
            2. Terry: Henry Cavill;
            3. Albert: Chris Hemsworth.

  8. Myra says:

    Excellent chapter! You’re so adept in providing character development without being over the top and verbose. Your writing skills never cease to amaze me.

    Can’t wait for the next chapter!

  9. moira78 says:

    Un altro capitolo ricco di emozioni! Qui si percepisce bene la lotta interiore di Candy che cerca di combattere contro la propria gelosia senza riuscirci: ma Miss Pony e Suor Lane la conoscono troppo bene e hanno già capito tutto…
    Ho già detto che adoro Albert? XD E il modo in cui tu lo descrivi, con questa sua sensibilità nel momento in cui deve fare qualcosa di tanto importante, è davvero commovente. Credo che lui stesso stia venendo a patti con il proprio cuore mentre il signor Cartwright, finalmente, gli concede i terreni: il fatto che sia tanto emozionato da dover trattenere le lacrime a stento è un chiaro segnale di quanto Candy e la sua felicità contino per lui.
    Ma mi sono anche accorta che Kimberly parla al passato del suo amore per Albert, quindi forse c’è speranza che al momento, pur non amando in maniera palese Jag, sia sulla buona strada per farlo. Mi sembra quasi di assistere alla nascita di due nuove coppie, non di una… 😉
    Grazie mille e al prossimo aggiornamento, attendo con ansia!

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Grazie mille, @moira78❣️ I won’t give spoilers here but you have good insights! Thank you for your encouraging words, especially about Albert! 💞

      In the old novel it was Mr. Brighton, Annie’s adoptive father who paid for the reconstruction, I heard. I don’t know if he bought the land too. But in CCFS Nagita sensei changed that to Albert, and I’m sure she has a reason for making this change, don’t you think? ☺️

      • moira78 says:

        Non sapevo che nel vecchio romanzo fosse stato il signor Brighton! Certo, sono assolutamente d’accordo con te: il fatto che nel nuovo sia Albert è proprio emblematico! Grazie per la tua risposta!

        • Ms Puddle says:

          Yes @moira78 I also think it has a significant meaning when it was Albert who paid for the land and the reconstruction, very similar to Master Jervie upgraded the orphanage where Judy had grown up (as described in the sequel of Daddy Long Legs). ☺️😉

      • Sarah says:

        That’s interesting.. Are there more such plot-changing alterations in the new novel?

        • Ms Puddle says:

          Yes, @Sarah, there are quite a few in addition to the land purchase and/or reconstruction. The more significant ones that I remember at this moment are:

          (1) Lagans grand hotel opening was in Chicago, not Miami (2) Stear’s memorial was held in the family memorial hall at Lakewood but in CCFS, Candy’s first time entering that heritage room was with Albert alone (3) similar to point 2, Albert and Candy went on a day trip to Lakewood, walking around the premises with Albert (as her prince) for the first time, is NOT in the old novel (4) Candy’s inability to “write” letters to Anthony until after that day trip (Albert pulling Candy into his arms, possibly the first time he took the initiative) is in CCFS only, etc. etc.

          • Sarah says:

            Thank you for your response, Ms Puddle. The information you have provided is impressive because it turns out that Albert’s significance in the new novel is much greater than in the old one. This speaks volumes about the fact that Albert’s character as well as the ‘ineffable’ bond between Candy and Albert are essential to Keiko Nagita; otherwise, she would not have placed so much emphasis on the progress of their relationship. Furthermore, Nagita would not have taken the time to specify in the 2010 CCFS text that Albert is only 10-11 years older than Candy and neither Candy nor Albert perceive each other in a paternal or fraternal way. Nagita has made her point and the intelligent and rational readers fully grasp that.

            • Ms Puddle says:

              You’re welcome, @Sarah.

              My sentiments exactly! As you said, the intelligent and rational readers can fully grasp that the author has clearly advanced the relationship between Candy and Albert in CCFS. On the other hand, Candy’s unsent letter to Terry was shorter and less emotional.

              If I’m not mistaken, the diary was introduced in the 3rd edition of the old novel but its significance is way more pronounced in CCFS.

              • Sarah says:

                Is that so? Didn’t know about that. I thought that the diary was an addition to the 2010 publication of the CCFS. When was the 3rd edition if the old novel published? Do you know?

                Thanks again!

                • Myra says:

                  Thank you for offering all that information @Ms Puddle. I’ve also got similar questions to those posed by @Sarah, however.

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  Thanks @Myra. Please read my reply to @Sarah.

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  Hi @Sarah, like you, I thought the diary was a new addition in CCFS but I was told that it had been introduced in the 3rd edition of the old novel (the one with no illustrations from Igarashi). Although I heard that there was no return of diary or stuff like that.

                  Unfortunately, I haven’t read the old novel myself except some bits and pieces in various editions, so I have no way to prove this. 🙁

                • Myra says:

                  Thank you @Ms Puddle!

                • Sarah says:

                  Thank you for clarifying, Ms Puddle.
                  It would have been useful to have access to this 3rd edition so as to verify if this claim is true or not. From what I have checked online, the 3rd edition was published in 2003. Is this accurate?

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  Hi @Sarah, I’m not sure about that, but I was told the diary was not that big a deal in the old novel. Whoever told me that could be wrong though.

                  Regardless, in CCFS the diary does play an important role in the story, especially when it comes to Candy and Albert’s relationship and how they handled it. Don’t you think?

                • Myra says:

                  It depends on the online source. In some websites, the 3rd edition is listed as 2003 and in others as 2000 or 2001. It’s probably either an inaccuracy coming from the said website or reprint.

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  Yes I agree with you, @Myra. I need to check my sources again, but even then, it might be wrong.

              • Myra says:

                Please take your time, Ms Puddle, and whenever convenient for you. Thanks again!

  1. September 30, 2021

    […] (to be continued…) […]

I would like to hear from you!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Translate »