Forget-Me-Not Chapter 7

You may also like...

123 Responses

  1. Danny says:

    Comence esta historia ayer y no la pude soltar!!!! Wow !!! Eres excelente ya estoy de nervios y esperando el proximo capitulo !!! Esa Kim me tiene intrigada y como siempre albert y candy no se dan cuenta que están enamorados… gracias por tan buena historia y estoy al pendiente … saludos !!!!

    • Ms Puddle says:

      ¡Muchas gracias por leer, Danny! 💞 Your encouraging feedback is much appreciated, and I’ll start writing the next chapter as soon as I’m less busy with my studies. Many thanks again ❣️

  2. Leda says:

    So pleased to have read this continuation to your fanfiction. It appears that you have created a well-thought-of plot in tandem with a solid structure because your story doesn’t have any loopholes or naiveties as of yet. Your writing style is impressive too because it’s simple but not simplistic. Sadly, some people tend to conflate those two terms and consider it a negative feature to write in a simple fashion where, in fact, it’s the exact opposite. On the contrary, the pretentious ones are those who tend to write tediously long and wordy narratives, hence, taking ages to get to the bloody point. Let’s not forget the renowned phrase of “less is more”, shall we?

    I’m glad you’re focusing on balancing your leisure time with your job. Both are awesome but in order to remain as such, we need to be able to tend to the needs of both of these vital contributing factors in our lives.

    Best wishes for you and to those dearest to you.

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Thank you so much for your compliments, @Leda❣️ So happy to hear that you think my plot is making sense so far. About my writing, I do admire other writers who like writing each of their scenes with detailed description. It’s just not my style. That being said, I’m glad you don’t mind I let the readers imagine a lot of things lol 😅

      Yes this month is going to be tough for me but hopefully it will work out. I want to be able to resume writing or drawing soon, but I’ll see how it goes.

      Best wishes to you too! Stay safe and take care 🙏

  3. Chiaroscuro says:

    Dear Ms Puddle,

    Thank you for being so generous as to share your wonderful fanfiction and fanart with us. Your recent illustration of Candy is so nuanced because it brings out the inner beauty of Candy’s character which is her sensitivity and thoughtfulness. I agree with fellow commenters who consider your portrayal of Candy to be much akin to Taylor Swift, whose beauty is not skin-deep but emits elegance and strength, simultaneously.

    I am also pleased to read the ways in which your story progresses via the use of excellent English. You’re to-the-point without being verbose. This is what true writing is all about.

    With Kind Regards.

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Thank you so much @Chiaroscuro❣️ I’m so blessed with kind supporters like you who keep me motivated and inspired. 🤗

      As I mentioned to others, my written English is rather simple and nothing fancy. But I’m delighted to hear that you’ve enjoyed how the story progresses so far. Thank you!

      Best wishes to you too!

  4. DanielleV says:

    Very interesting chapter and it’s a great idea that you have added your impressive artwork. Candy looks stunning in those new drawings of yours. I like both the sepia and the coloured ones. It’s impossible for me to choose which one I prefer because both are amazing in their own distinct way.

  5. Valkyrie says:

    How are you, Ms Puddle?

    Your new entry has been an enjoyment to read. I can’t wait for your next chapter. You bring so much life into these characters which are already much appreciated by us. I wonder whether the author of CCFS/CCHD had intended to elaborate more on Albert’s past experience in Africa-in particular, with regards to his relationship with the nurse from the States.

    What do you think?

    • Myra says:

      Hi Valkyrie!
      It seems that in some of Nagita’s more recent interviews, she mentioned that she had wanted to write more about Neil, Susanna, Terry and Albert but certain obstacles came in the way including editorial restrictions regarding word limit. In her 2019 interview in Paris, she had addressed this issue albeit briefly. She seemed pretty keen on wanting to expand more on Susanna’s character because she found it fascinating (I would disagree with her but I’m not the writer of this story). She also appeared to be quite sympathetic towards Neil’s character for some bizarre reason.
      Anyway, no matter how much I personally disagree with her viewpoints on Susanna and Neil, she’s the legit writer and she’s the one who calls the shots.

      • Valkyrie says:

        That’s interesting.. Thanks for letting me know. I’ll look into it. It’s ironic though that Nagita doesn’t share that same deranged hatred against Susanna as some of those frothing-at-the-mouth hysterical Terrfans do.
        Just like you, I’m not particularly fond of Susanna and I am not fond of Annie either. Both of those characters represent traits which I neither approve of nor respect, irrespective of one’s gender or orientation.

        • Myra says:

          Glad to be of help. Finding that interview is easy because both A&T fans have it available on their social media pages. If you have any trouble finding it, let me know.
          I also find it ironic that Keiko Nagita is fond of Susanna, in stark contrast to certain Terry’s ageing and mentally decadent fans who consider her to be the root of all evil. It’s really weird that they get all wired up over a make-believe character. Apparently, they have no meaningful personal and social life of their own.
          However, it’s not the first time Keiko Nagita has contradicted and refuted many of those ludicrous and nonsensical arguments coming from those poor old Tfans and it certainly won’t be the last.😉

        • Ms Puddle says:

          Thank you @Myra. Like you and @Valkyrie, I’m not particularly fond of Susanna and Annie. To me, they are slightly better than Eliza, who’s the worst for sure. I wish Nagita sensei could write more about Patty though. I like her a lot more than Annie.

          @Valkyrie, I agree with you that the author does not hate Susanna at all. The beautiful actress was the author’s means to break up Terry and Candy after all. Albert was the destined love all along, and the author did not yield to the pressure in spite of Terry’s popularity back then.

          • Myra says:

            Agreed. Eliza’s character is ridiculously wicked to the point where she’s reduced to a mere character.

            • Myra says:

              Meant to say “caricature”.

            • DreamCatcher says:

              Yeah, Eliza is unrealistically evil to the point where she’s no longer intimidating or menacing but simply comical.

              • Ms Puddle says:

                Agree with you both @Myra and @DreamCatcher. But Eliza played a crucial role in “breaking up” Terry and Candy’s relationship. Since then, the two went separate paths.

                • Myra says:

                  That’s correct but Eliza was never an obstacle for Terry being able to keep contact with Candy after he had visited the orphanage where the latter grew up. Eliza is evil but she’s nothing but a cunning-fool..
                  Furthermore, Eliza has no ability or power to coerce or convince Terry to refrain from keeping in touch with Candy after leaving for the USA. All he had to do was provide his own or his mother’s contact details to the directors of the orphanage so as to maintain contact with the person he supposedly loved.
                  In addition, it wasn’t Eliza who told or forced Terry to keep his mouth shut when rumours were spreading that he and Susanna were a couple. Again, all he had to do was to refute and negate those claims and mention that he was already in a relationship or he didn’t have to mention anything at all. It would suffice simply to state that he and Susanna are only colleagues and nothing more than that. But he didn’t do that and Eliza has got nothing to do with his controversial silence and his lack of respect for Candy.
                  Lest we should forget, Terry is a dude who is outspoken and has no qualms in telling others off if they mess with him. However, he recoiled like a spineless coward and kept silent when those aforesaid rumours were spreading like wildfire. With that being said, those who really care about their significant other transcend all obstacles and boundaries possible in order to defend their relationship with the person they love.
                  Albert, for instance, jeopardized the already volatile relationship with the Ardlay elders in order to clear Candy’s name by getting Sarah Lagan to publicly announce that Candy was neither a liar nor a thief. There was so much at stake for Albert but he had Candy’s back without ever expecting anything in return. It takes fortitude and integrity to fight for the person you love and Terry failed miserably in that respect whilst Albert fully confirmed how much he respects, appreciates and above all, honours Candy’s good name and dignity as well as he honours his own personal integrity.

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  Well said, @Myra!! I agree with you 100%. May I quote your comment in my new post (it will be some time much later this month)?

                • Myra says:

                  Sure! Thanks for considering my comment. That’s so nice of you.

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  I’m the one who should thank you, @Myra 😊

                • DreamCatcher says:

                  That sure is an excellent commentary, Myra!

                • DreamCatcher says:

                  However, I have got some queries and I wonder if they simply have to do with the fact that there are overt inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the CCFS. The first query has to do with Susanna’s accident. How is it possible that Candy didn’t know about this and nobody didn’t inform her about it either? Terry and Susanna were high-profile thespians, both of whom were constantly in the spotlight to the point where their personal lives were trespassed by various tabloids and gossip columns. Based on the text itself, Annie would always know about Terry and Susanna as she apparently enjoyed reading such cheap tabloid magazines and gossip columns. How did such a glaring even escape her notice? Secondly, why didn’t Terry inform Candy about this whole predicament himself? Only a mindless fool would believe that Candy would have not caught wind of this situation during her stay in New York, especially during the major theatrical production of the play where Terry and Susanna were supposed to be stars. This tragic event would have been the talk of the town (or rather city, in this respect). Third, why did Terry so easily prefer Susanna over Candy? Only the intellectually impaired would claim that he was guilty or should feel guilty for an accident which was a result of a failure regarding the health and safety of the employees involved in this theatrical production. It was not Terry who hurled that spotlight on Susanna’s leg nor did he thrust her body under it during its descent. He’s really just as much of a victim as she is. He could have been injured or killed due to the criminal negligence of the technical crew. Why is he carrying the weight of a tragedy in which he has neither responsibility nor fault? Why is Nagita keeping Terry silent on this matter? To be honest, it really doesn’t matter what Candy or Susanna have to say regarding Terry’s feelings as both these women are only in a position to speak for their own feelings. The only character in this story who is in a legit position to speak for and about Terry’s feelings is Terry himself and for some bizarre reason Nagita has pressed the mute button, if not eliminating Terry’s role altogether.

                • DreamCatcher says:

                  Just to avoid any confusion, I meant to type “glaring event” and not “glaring even”.

                • Myra says:

                  Thank you @Ms Puddle and @DreamCatcher!

                  As for you, @DreamCatcher, your questions are astute and spot on. I have also been wondering how the hell Candy didn’t know about Susanna’s accident beforehand. Apparently, Terry had decided to keep it from her and didn’t even have the good grace to discuss the matter with her as all couples do when one respects the other and regards the significant other as an equal.

                  I’m also wondering how nobody had read about this aforementioned accident since Candy, Albert and their friends would be keen enough to read the news. Apparently, Albert was no dimwit, shallow and vacuous moron like Annie who would waster time flipping through gossip columns, but he was definitely an avid reader due to his academic education and inquisitive nature irrespective of his temporary amnesiac state. That said, he would have read about this tragic accident from the serious newspapers because Susanna’s accident was not limited to gossip columns but to nationwide discussions dealing with health hazards within the workforce along with workers’ rights.

                  These issues were already going rampant in the early 20th century and there were many a trade union which focused on fighting for financial rights and well-being of artists and actors alike. Susanna’s accident would have sent shock-waves throughout the theatre world and also inspire many journalists to report this event within a socio-political scope and landscape.

                  Let’s take the modern-day event of the tragedy and possible crime (depends how the court of justice in the US determines it) which occurred during the making of the movie “Rust” where the Hollywood actor, Alec Baldwin allegedly shot and killed a member of the technical crew, the cinematographer-Halyna Hutchins. These events are never limited within the visual arts world since they involve health hazard and even the loss of human life. It’s impossible for anyone not to be informed of these events unless they live under a rock.

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  Good points, @DreamCatcher and @Myra. I really don’t know what to say. It could be an oversight of the author and/or the editorial board. However, one point remains valid — the people in New York had undoubtedly heard of the accident that Susanna had taken Terry’s place.

                  Why did Terry feel responsible? First, he was fully aware of Susanna’s feelings for him, and I suppose he was quite affected by her sacrificial act. Secondly, deep inside he was probably attracted to her as well. At any rate, he did not have the heart to leave Susanna, who became handicapped because of him. Candy sensed his struggles and subsequent decision simply by the way he rushed to the hospital and carried Susanna in his arms. If I were Candy, I would have left him too. Candy would not be genuinely happy with Terry because of Susanna. Their long-distance relationship had to end one way or another, because even if Candy had insisted, Terry might have to tell her point blank that he had decided to take care of Susanna from now on. Just my two cents. 😉

                • Myra says:

                  I agree with you, Ms Puddle. Deep down inside, Candy had probably sensed that something was going on between Terry and Susanna. Perhaps they weren’t a couple yet or maybe they were albeit a clandestine one. Apparently, Susanna denies all that in her letter to Candy but who wouldn’t? Only a complete moron would actually believe that Susanna would be upfront about this. Let’s face it, when rumours like that emerge between two people, it’s almost certain that something is really going on between them. There’s no smoke without fire. Besides, in both the anime and the manga, Terry admits (to himself) that he’s attracted to Susanna.
                  Regarding Albert, I would have liked to know how he felt and what he thought about this whole mess. Given the fact that he was an astute and acutely intelligent young man, he probably would have also suspected that there was more going on than originally fathomed by the relative parties involved.

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  Agree with you, @Myra. I wonder what Albert thought about this too, and indeed it was a mess. Yet he must know how Candy felt as he was there for her until she recovered. That was probably why it took Albert so long before he could talk about Terry casually again (as Candy wrote in her unsent letter to Terry in CCFS).

                  In the manga I think Terry only said he did not dislike Susanna (in Japanese text), but his actions betrayed him. I don’t remember right now whether he was aware Susanna had lied to Candy back in Chicago, but I remember Terry was very forgiving. It’s time to double check my manga version lol 😅

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Thank you @Valkyrie for your positive feedback! 💗 I don’t know if Nagita sensei ever planned to elaborate on Albert’s story while he was in Africa, and in my fanfic I just let my imagination run wild, because Candy seems very curious about his experience in Africa too.

      Besides, he’s a handsome man with athletic build, so it’s hard to believe he’s got no secret admirers, don’t you think?

      • Valkyrie says:

        Many thanks for your insightful information, Ms Puddle! I am in full agreement with you and only a delusional fool would actually believe that such a charismatic, noble and beautiful character such as Albert did not have his fair share of admirers. Even the author had mentioned that her heart would always beat very fast whenever she wrote about him. Perhaps Albert is nothing else but a figment of her imagination; alternatively, he could be an ideal character or an idealized version of someone she had fallen in love with in the past. There are rumours that Albert’s character is an allusion to the author’s husband but none of these rumours have been confirmed or substantiated. Instead, they’re just online gossip floating around the internet but it’s fun to toy around with the idea, nonetheless.

        • Ms Puddle says:

          Yes @Valkyrie I heard of those rumours too, and you’re right that Albert could be purely an imagination or an idealized version of a man Nagita-sensei knows or has fallen in love with. If it’s the latter case, lucky for her to have known such a man of high quality. 😉

          When I am writing about Albert, my heart beats faster too, lol 😅

          • Valkyrie says:

            Couldn’t agree more with you!

            Irrespective of the various rumours which circulate about the CCFS characters, what matters is what the author says herself and she has clearly and undeniably stated publicly via her official interviews that her heart beats fast with excitement whenever she writes about Albert.

            It’s interesting that Candy’s heart also beats fast whenever she hears “anohito’s” voice and she says so in the conclusion of the said novel.😉

            • Ms Puddle says:

              Right on, @Valkyrie!

              Also, didn’t Candy tell Albert honestly that her heart skipped a beat when she saw him come to Pony’s Home (just before his confession)? That speaks volumes, doesn’t it?

              • Valkyrie says:

                That’s a great point, Ms Puddle, and I’ll add that Candy had also developed a rather possessive streak when it came to Albert because in her letters to him she expressed that she wanted to see him again and have him all to herself. She was never satisfied with his brief visitations and encounters, hence, demanding more and more from him as time went by. This isn’t coming from a fanfic but from the official text as written by Nagita herself. Therefore, this textual evidence cannot be contested or denied.

                • Ms Puddle says:

                  My sentiments exactly, @Valkyrie!

                  As you said, it’s all written in the novel (mainly the epilogue) where Terry was only mentioned once by name, as someone in Candy’s past. The other time Candy alluded to him without a name, also as a man in her past.

                  On the other hand, Candy was clearly acting like Albert’s girlfriend, and as you said, she wanted more and more from Albert that she refused to reply to his letter and demanded his presence. LOL…

  6. Irana93 says:

    Hi there!

    I am so impressed with your new fanart. Both the sepia and the colored version of Candy in formal attire are absolutely stunning. Her beautiful wide-set eyes are so expressive.

    No need to worry about typos because we’re all susceptible to making them. Moreover, your English is excellent so you needn’t be concerned about that either.

    Best Wishes!

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Thank you so much @Irana93❣️ What a delight to hear that you’re impressed! So glad you found Candy’s eyes expressive 🤗 Also thanks for your encouraging words about my written English. I’ll continue to try my best 💪

      Christmas is around the corner and if time permits I’d like to draw something with the Xmas theme. However, that might mean I won’t have much time to write. So yes, I’m having a debate with myself lol 😅

      Take care!

  7. Lakewood says:

    This is such a lovely illustration of Candy. I have read all the commentary so far and I am in full alignment with those who demonstrate an affinity for the retro. My husband and I are avid collectors of antique merchandise such as furniture, paintings and manuscripts. Had I not been a lawyer in profession, I would have definitely chosen to become an librarian, antiquarian or a palaeographer-medievalist as my craft. My only complaint is that neither Nagita nor Igarashi had been competent in attaining the ambience surrounding the early 20th century. Instead, Igarashi’s drawing are too 1970s in style and Nagita’s writing suggests zero identity when it comes to the early 1900s and Interbellum as her narrative style is far too vague and generic. In contrast, your drawing of Candy is much more engaging with regards to the ways in which women dressed and behaved during the aforesaid century and your writing also offers better insight to these times of the past.

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Hi @Lakewood, as much as I value your positive feedback, I don’t deserve such compliments. 🤗 That being said, I truly appreciate your kind and encouraging words❣️ I do agree with you that Igarashi’s designs, though beautiful, were heavily influenced by the fashion trend in the 1970s. Candy, Annie and Patty should not wear knee-length skirts, for example.

      I’m not a collector myself, but I like visiting heritage museums and browsing the antique furniture and classic stuff. They are fascinating to say the least.

  8. DreamCatcher says:

    What a beautiful illustration of Candy, @Ms Puddle! I’m pleased that you have included both versions of this illustration-sepia and coloured. Candy looks so much like Taylor Swift in this illustration.
    It goes to show that nobody can buy class and Candy’s character musters utmost class and integrity irrespective of her humble financial and social background. Keiko Nagita had done an awesome job in depicting this aspect by juxtaposing Candy’s superior character to Eliza’s lowest of the low disposition. No matter how affluent Eliza and Neal are, they are utterly impoverished and destitute in terms of dignity; neither do they demonstrate nor do they receive any respect. It’s beyond any shadow of a doubt that they don’t deserve any iota of respect and that’s the reason why they are diseased with such nonsensical enmity and jealousy against Candy.
    That said, both Candy and Albert are so deserving for one another as they share such personal integrity and respect for others as well as for themselves. Nagita was adept at creating these fine individuals with such depth of character.

  9. DreamCatcher says:

    What a beautiful illustration of Candy, @Ms Puddle! I’m pleased that you have included both versions of this illustration-sepia and coloured. Candy looks so much like Taylor Swift in this illustration.
    It goes to show that nobody can buy class and Candy’s character musters utmost class and integrity irrespective of her humble financial and social background. Keiko Nagita had done an awesome job in depicting this aspect by juxtaposing Candy’s superior character to Eliza’s lowest of the low disposition. No matter how affluent Eliza and Neal are, they are utterly impoverished and destitute in terms of dignity; neither do they demonstrate nor do they receive any respect. It’s beyond any shadow of a doubt that they don’t deserve an iota of respect and that’s the main reason why they are diseased with such nonsensical enmity and jealousy against Candy.
    That said, both Candy and Albert are deserving on one another as they share such personal integrity and respect for others as well as for themselves. Nagita was adept at creating such fine individuals with such depth and quality of character.

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Well said @DreamCatcher about Candy’s noble character when compared to Eliza and Neal!

      Yes Nagita-sensei did show that one’s origin does not necessarily shape one’s personality or how one treats the others. Indeed, Candy and Albert deserve each other. Neither is perfect but they are no doubt my favourite characters in CC.

      Thank you very much for your compliment concerning my new fanart❣️ The fact that you compared my illustration of Candy to Taylor Swift makes me so happy! 🥰

      I noticed there is a duplicate comment. Did you experience any glitches when you posted your comment the first time, DreamCatcher?

      • DreamCatcher says:

        It’s true that the Candy-Albert couple has become increasingly popular over this past decade by the younger generations, in stark contrast to the older conservative folks who were fixated on toxic characters and abusive relationships. Fortunately, times are getting better and people worldwide mock and dispense with ludicrously toxic male characters such as Terry and Neal, both of which have been reduced to mere caricatures by younger people who respect and value themselves. Characters such as Albert, who respect and appreciate empowered women, are massively popular in both the creative industry as well as in real life.

        As for the duplicate comment, I had received a notification that my first attempt didn’t go through so I tried again.

        • Ms Puddle says:

          I guess so too, @DreamCatcher. Not only that, I was told some Terry fans were “converted” when they grew older and wiser lol…

          I have a feeling that many of them were misled by the Anime version, which put way too much emphasis on Terry as though he was “the one”. Hence, the fans felt terribly let down at the end. Compared to the manga, the ending of the anime was rushed and poorly done. Candy’s lukewarm (casual) reaction to “reuniting” with her prince left many question marks about her true feelings for Albert.

          Sorry about the glitches that you experienced, DreamCatcher. I hope it wasn’t too much trouble for you to repost your comment. I’ll delete that later (if I remember lol).

          • DreamCatcher says:

            The irony is that the reason Terry fans exist in the first place is due to the anime. What’s even more ironic-if not utterly moronic-is that some of those fans desperately try to trash the anime even though it’s thanks to the TOEI producers that Terry’s character has any worth to begin with. The TOEI producers extracted the finest qualities of Albert’s character and then “grafted” them into Terry’s character.
            In reality, Terry’s character, as depicted in the anime, constitutes a “medley” of Albert’s noble character and the “positive” traits of Terry’s own character in tandem with removing most of the violent and self-destructive features which rendered the latter an acutely toxic and chauvinist woman-beater as in the case of the manga and, in particular, the revised novel. Notable examples are the removal of Terry’s violent and abusive acts against Candy in the May Fest scene as well as adding scenes where Terry is constantly supportive and present in Candy’s life, whether physically or emotionally or both. However, such supportiveness is only found in the anime and neither in the manga nor novel.
            Therefore, it was only when people started to read the manga and novel that Albert’s character started to be appreciated, especially as a prospective suitor for Candy. In the anime, Albert is always a highly respected character but he is perceived mainly as a form of “guardian angel” or “bosom friend” for Candy, whereas in the manga and novel the author makes it clear that there is a romantic relationship brewing between an adult Candy and an adult Albert.
            The bottom line is that the anime has created many misconceptions about the actual story as written by Keiko Nagita. If she had wanted to maintain the favourable portrayal of Terry as in the anime, she would have made maintained that image in the novel as well. Yet, Keiko Nagita not only maintains the manga version of Terry’s toxic and abusive nature but makes him even more violent against Candy in the novel. On the other hand, Keiko Nagita elevates Albert’s character in the manga and even more so in novel. She further reinforces Albert’s high calibre in terms of his noble character as well as his utmost respect for women.
            That said, it’s not surprising that the younger generations and those who have read the manga and novel developed a much greater admiration and respect for Albert’s character, hence, tossing toxic male characters (which used to be popular amongst the older people) into the hot dumpster fire where they belong.

            • Michelle says:

              Excellent comment!👍👍

              • DreamCatcher says:

                Thanks @Michelle! Just ignore a minor typo towards the end of my comment. I wanted to remove the word “made” (wanted to say: “..she would have maintained..”) but I guess I simply forgot..;-)

            • Ms Puddle says:

              Well said, @DreamCatcher! My sentiments exactly! I don’t have much to add except that some people said that TOEI producers had tried to downplay Candy and Albert’s romantic development because they lived together. They also put them in different bedrooms. The target audience was elementary school kids after all.

              Therefore, I’m so glad Nagita sensei did stick to her plot and character development in the new novel. Like you said, she could have made Terry nicer or more gentle, but she did the opposite.

  10. Gabriella says:

    Hello and thank you for taking the time to “spoil” us with your beautiful illustration of Candy as well as an update to your intriguing fanfiction. It’s always forthcoming and a delight to receive such notifications and updates from you.

    Looking forward to your next work and projects!

    • Ms Puddle says:

      Thank you @Gabriella you’re so kind!💗 I actually enjoyed the process of writing or drawing. Knowing that people like you have enjoyed the end products have encouraged me and kept me motivated or inspired. 🤗💪

I would like to hear from you!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Translate »
%d bloggers like this: